Skip to content
Rhino Resource Center

The world's largest online rhinoceros library dedicated to assisting research and conservation efforts globally.

Article Book chapter

View options

Emslie, R.H. 1994. Property assessment for introduction of black rhinos.

Property assessment for introduction of black rhinos

Chapter from the book
Penzhorn, B.L.; Kriek, N.P.J. 1994. Proceedings of a symposium on rhinos as game ranch animals. Onderstepoort, Republic of South Africa, 9-10 September 1994. pp. i-iv, 1-242.
Book chapter
Kock, M.D.; Atkinson, M.W. 1994. Dehorning of black (Diceros bicornis) and white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum): the Zimbabwean experience. pp. 42-47, tables 1-4
Book chapter
Emslie, R.H. 1994. Regional conservation goals for black rhinos in Namibia/South Africa. pp. 50-54, figs. 1-2
Book chapter
Emslie, R.H.; Adcock, K. 1994. Feeding ecology of black rhinos. pp. 65-81
Book chapter
Emslie, R.H.; Adcock, K. 1994. Managing black rhinos. pp. 100-107
Book chapter
Foose, T.J.; Miller, R.E. 1994. African rhinoceros populations in North America. pp. 31-34, tables 1-2
Book chapter
Geldenhuys, L.J. 1994. Dehorning black rhino: the Namibian experience. pp. 48-49
Book chapter
Kriek, N.P.J. 1994. A stress-related disease of white rhinoceroses caused by commensal bacteria. pp. 186-188. pp. 186-188
Book chapter
Hall-Martin, A.; Knight, M.H. 1994. Conservation and management of black rhinoceros in South African national parks. pp. 11-19, figs. 1-2, tables 1-2
Book chapter
Harley, E.H.; O’Ryan, C. 1994. Use of molecular genetics in rhinoceros conservation. pp. 56-58
Book chapter
Heerden, J. van; Keffen, R.H.; Kuhn, F.; Rogers, P.S.; Morkel, P.; Atalia, N.; Raath, J.P.; Kernes, D.J. 1994. Clinical pathology parameters in white, black and northern white rhinos. pp. 189-195, tables 1-4. pp. 189-195, tables 1-4
Book chapter
Lategan, P. 1994. The role of the Endangered Species Protection Unit (ESPU) of the South African Police in combating rhinoceros poaching and the smuggling of rhino horn. pp. 4-6
Book chapter
Loh i Cheng 1994. What has the Republic of China done to curtail trade in rhino products?. pp. 7-10
Book chapter
Maggs, K.A.R.; Greeff, J. de V. 1994. Special measures to protect the Kruger National Park rhino population. pp. 20-24
Book chapter
Meltzer, D.A.G. 1994. Diseases in free-ranging black and white rhinoceroses. pp. 176-179
Book chapter
Miller, R.E. 1994. Diseases of black rhinoceroses in captivity. pp. 180-185
Book chapter
Morkel, P. 1994. Chemical immobilization of the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis). pp. 128-135
Book chapter
Paglia, D.E. 1994. Haemolytic anaemia in captive black rhinoceroses: potential strategies for prevention and therapy. pp. 196-198. pp. 196-198
Book chapter
Penzhorn, B.L.; Krecek, R.C.; Horak, I.G.; Verster, A.J.M.; Walker, J.B.; Boomker, J.; Knapp, S.E.; Quandt, S.K.F. 1994. Parasites of African rhinos: a documentation. pp. 168-175, tables 1-2. pp. 168-175, tables 1-2
Book chapter
Pienaar, D.J. 1994. Habitat preference of the white rhino in the Kruger National Park. pp. 59-64, figs. 1-2
Book chapter
Pienaar, D.J. 1994. Social organization and behaviour of the white rhinoceros. pp. 87-92, tables 1-2
Book chapter
Potter, D. 1994. Update on the current situation of rhinos in Natal. pp. 25-30. pp. 25-30
Book chapter
Raath, J.P. 1994. Anaesthesia of the white rhino. pp. 119-127, table 1. pp. 119-127, table 1
Book chapter
Rogers, P.S. 1994. Transportation and boma management of rhinos. pp. 136-154, tables 1-2
Book chapter
Swart, M.K.J.; Ferguson, J.W.H. 1994. How vulnerable is the black rhino? A genetic and demographic analysis. p. 55
Book chapter
Du Toit, J.G. 1994. White and black rhinoceros as game ranch animals. pp. 111-118, figs.1-2, table 1
Book chapter
Du Toit, J.G.; Penzhorn, B.L.; Westhuizen, E. van der 1994. Bibliography of African rhinos. pp. 199-242
Book chapter
Du Toit, R. 1994. Management of black rhino in Zimbabwean conservancies. pp. 95-99
Book chapter
Trendler, K. 1994. Hand-rearing rhino calves. pp. 162-163
Book chapter
Wucher, M. 1994. A technique for making dental impressions and casts of immobilised black rhinoceros (Diceros bicorns) and white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum). pp. 164-167, figs. 1-2
Book chapter
Walker, C.H. 1994. Rhinos in Africa – the present situation.. pp. 1-3
Book chapter
Walker, C.H. 1994. Black rhino on private land – the experience of Lapalala Wilderness, South Africa. pp. 108-110
Book chapter
Adcock, K. 1994. The relevance of ‘territorial’ behaviour in black rhino to their population management. pp. 82-86, fig. 1, table 1
Book chapter
Adcock, K.; Emslie, R.H. 1994. The role of trophy hunting in white rhino conservation, with special reference to BOP parks. pp. 35-41, fig. 1, tables 1-4
Book chapter
Bertschinger, H.J. 1994. Reproduction in black and white rhinos: a review. pp. 155-161, fig.1
Note
Location World Subject General Species All Rhino Species

Property assessment for Diceros bicornis. When rhino densities get too high, density dependent feedbacks can start operating on the population. A number of factors then can act to depress population growth rates, and maybe even reduce population size. For example poorer nutrition caused by increased densities can lead to .... - A decline in conception rates - An increase in age at first calving - An increase in juvenile mortality rate - An increase in inter-calving interval - An increase in social problems and especially fighting (esp. males) Meeting the regional conservation goals requires you to rather take off animals before performance is reduced when densities reach critical levels. Before being able to bid on auction for black rhinos you will be required by the Natal Parks Board to have your property assessed. One of the main reasons behind such an assessment is to try to ensure that by putting a minimum founder number on your farm you will not be, or soon become, overstocked. The assessment is split into two sections relating to 1) biological and 2) non-biological assessments. BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT The biological assessment aims to determine whether your property is big enough to have a minimum long-term carrying capacity of a minimum of 10 animals, and preferably at least a carrying capacity of 13. It also estimates the ecological carrying capacity with a view to estimating the maximum founder number you can put in. This is normally no more than half of your estimated maximum productivity carrying capacity. To be able to bid on auction the maximum founder number for your population has to be assessed at at least five. The assessment team should also be able to give you an initial rough estimate of the Estimated Maximum Productivity Carrying Capacity (EMPCC) for your property. This represents the maximum population density at which density-dependent effects are believed to have no negative feedback on individual reproductive performance. EMPCC effectively represents the estimated size of population at which maximum-sustainable yield can be obtained. EMPCC is perhaps better known as Estimated Economic Carrying Capacity. NON-BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT In the case of auctions the decision is simply whether or not each property passes a set of minimum criteria to be allowed to bid. The non-biological assessment is split into a number of subjects. In each subject the assessors are primarily looking for any obvious negative or positive points. In a few cases failure to meet certain criteria may mean you may not be allowed to bid on auction. The main topics considered are 1: In-house security/management Staff Density, Staff Skills, Willingness to Cooperate/Attitude, Apparent Management Competence/Conservation Record, Detection and Reaction Ability, Staff Conditions/Apparent Motivation 2. Socio-political considerations 3. Fencing Must have or be prepared to put in a fence which at least meets minimum set standards. 4. Veterinary considerations Only really a problem if anthrax occurs every year. 5. Ability to remove animals in future Difficult terrain for capture should be listed as an obvious negative factor. This is especially the case for populations with estimated carrying capacities of less than 20. This is because these very small populations will undoubtedly have to be intensively managed in future. This is not sufficient grounds to fail a property on its own. 6. Other minimum standards Potential areas will FAIL if the following criteria are not met: In Namibia, farmers must be a bona fide land-owners and Namibian citizens, and confirmed by their banks to be in no financial difficulties. In the case of a company-owned farm, the applicant must be the major shareholder. Resident land-owners, and those without criminal records are preferred. In Namibia, the land-owner must be prepared to enter into a contractual agreement with the government about the rhino. In Namibia the farm- currently must be at least 6 000ha; in South Africa the minimum size is determined by the estimated ecological carrying capacity of the vegetation, which must be at least 3 000ha. The rhinos should be free-ranging. For a number of biological reasons (discussed later) larger areas are preferable to small properties. The property should be in the range of the black rhino ecotype involved. There should be no chance of mixing of different ecotypes. Get a more detailed assessment before buying Before spending vast amounts of money on buying black rhino, it is strongly recommended that you employ a recognised rhino assessment consultant to give you a more detailed assessment. See paper on managing rhinos by Emslie and Adcock in this volume.

Secret Link