 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Karibu
New User
Posts: 2
Joined:
Jun 29th - 12:21
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
|
| Posted: Jul 26 2012, 03:26 PM |
|
|
Dear experts, is their an answer, why their are two first discribers for rhinocertidae and which one is to prefer? And is their an article about this problem for citation? Thank you very much and sincerly
Thomas
|
|
|
 quote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kees
Moderator
Posts: 110
Joined:
Oct 26th - 08:27
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Jul 27 2012, 08:52 AM |
|
|
There are not two first describers of the name for the family of rhinoceroses. Gray (1821) used the spelling Rhynocerotidae. Owen (1845) then was the first to use the alternative spelling of Rhinocerotidae, which we use today. Both references are on the site and you can check what they wrote.
--------------------
Kees Rookmaaker
|
|
|
quote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karibu
New User
Posts: 2
Joined:
Jun 29th - 12:21
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Jul 27 2012, 09:09 AM |
|
|
Thank you very much for this very fine detail. Sincerly
Thomas
|
|
|
quote |
|
|
|
|
|
Rhinocerotidae Gray 1821 or Owen 1845
